Sexing Stegosaurus “Stegosaurus plates may have differed between male, female”

Some Stegosaurus had wide plates, some had tall, with the wide plates being up to 45 percent larger overall than the tall plates. According to a new study by University of Bristol, UK student, Evan Saitta, the tall-plated Stegosaurus and the wide-plated Stegosaurus were not two distinct species, nor were they individuals of different age: they were actually males and females. This is the first convincing evidence for sexual differences in a species of dinosaur. Credit: Copyright Evan Saitta

Stegosaurus, a large, herbivorous dinosaur with two staggered rows of bony plates along its back and two pairs of spikes at the end of its tail, lived roughly 150 million years ago during the Late Jurassic in the western United States.

Some individuals had wide plates, some had tall, with the wide plates being up to 45 per cent larger overall than the tall plates. According to the new study, the tall-plated Stegosaurus and the wide-plate Stegosaurus were not two distinct species, nor were they individuals of different age: they were actually males and females.

Professor Michael Benton, Director of the Masters in Palaeobiology at the University of Bristol said: “Evan made this discovery while he was completing his undergraduate thesis at Princeton University. It’s very impressive when an undergraduate makes such a major scientific discovery.

Sexual dimorphism (a term used to describe distinct anatomical differences between males and females of the same species) is common in living animals — think of the manes of lions or the antlers of deer — yet is surprisingly difficult to determine in extinct species.

Despite many previous claims of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs, current researchers find them to be inconclusive because they do not rule out other possible explanations for why differences in anatomy might be present between fossil specimens. For example, two individuals that differ in anatomy might be two separate species, a young and an old individual, or a male and a female individual.

Having spent six summers in central Montana as part of an excavation crew digging up the first ever Stegosaurus ‘graveyard’, Evan Saitta was able to test these alternative explanations and others in the species Stegosaurus mjosi.

The group of dinosaurs excavated in Montana demonstrated the coexistence of individuals that only varied in their plates. Other skeletal differences indicating separation of ecological niches would have been expected if the two were different species.

The study also found that the two varieties were not a result of growth. CT scanning at Billings Clinic in Montana, as well as thin sections sampled from the plates for microscope analysis, showed that the bone tissues had ceased growing in both varieties. Neither type of plate was in the process of growing into the other.

With other possibilities ruled out, the best explanation for the two varieties of plates is that one type belonged to males and the other, females.

Speculating about which is which, Evan Saitta said: “As males typically invest more in their ornamentation, the larger, wide plates likely came from males. These broad plates would have provided a great display surface to attract mates. The tall plates might have functioned as prickly predator deterrents in females.”

Stegosaurus may not have been the only dinosaur to exhibit sexual dimorphism. Other species showed extra-large crests or nose horns, which were potentially sexual features. Male animals often fight or display for mates, just like red deer or peacocks today.

Not only does Saitta’s work show that dinosaurs exhibited sexual dimorphism, it suggests that the ornamentation of at least some species was used for sexual display.

The presence of sexual dimorphism in an extinct species can provide scientists with a much clearer picture of its behaviour than would otherwise be possible.

Saitta ET (2015). Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism in the Plated Dinosaur Stegosaurus mjosi (Ornithischia, Stegosauria) from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Western USA. PLoS ONE, 2015 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123503

Note: The above story is based on materials provided by University of Bristol.